shadow
Call for a Free Consultation
       Washington D.C.   (202) 659-5500   |   Virginia   (703) 218-4410   |   Maryland   (301) 345-5700    Search
Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, L.L.PCapitol hillFighting for justice for over 30 years
 
 
 
Success Stories
 

Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, L.L.P. Wins Significant Appellate Victory

Collins v. Smith. Marc Fiedler, the appellate specialist at Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, L.L.P., recently won an important victory in a medical-malpractice case. On February 15, 2008, the D.C. Court of Appeals upheld the wrongful-death jury verdict of over $750,000 in favor of the wife and son of a forty-six-year-old Metrobus operator who had died as a result of a blood clot in his heart, which probably would have been prevented if his doctor had prescribed blood-thinning drugs.

The case arose from the medical treatment received by the bus operator, Mr. Smith, after he accidentally tore the Achilles tendon in his lower left leg. His orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Collins, put a cast on his leg. The cast limited Mr. Smith's ability to move about, increasing the risk that he would develop in his leg a type of blood clot known as deep-vein thrombosis (“DVT”). But Dr. Collins failed to prescribe anticlotting drugs to prevent DVT. Mr. Smith did develop DVT, from which a large blood clot broke off and traveled through his bloodstream to his heart, killing him.

Mr. Smith's wife and son filed a wrongful-death action accusing Dr. Collins of committing medical malpractice. At trial, the Smiths’ medical experts testified that Dr. Collins’ failure to prescribe blood thinners was negligent and probably caused Mr. Smith’s death. A jury returned a verdict against Dr. Collins in the amount of $761,604.

On appeal, Dr. Collins challenged the sufficiency of the material relied on by the expert witnesses for the Smiths. The Smiths’ appellate lawyer, Marc Fiedler, argued that the experts’ testimony was adequately based on their extensive training and experience, attendance at medical conferences, and review of relevant medical literature. The D.C. Court of Appeals agreed there was a sufficient basis for the experts’ testimony, and affirmed the trial-court judgment.

Click here to read the D.C. Court of Appeals Decision »

 
 
Let us review your case now
 
 
Practice Areas

bullet Workers Compensation Information
 
  - Work Place Safety
  - Workers Compensation FAQs
bullet Construction Accident Information
 
  - Burns at Construction Sites
  - Scaffold and Ladder Falls at Construction Sites
  - Scaffold and Ladder Safety
  - Construction Accident Safety Tips
  - Construction Accident Emergency Procedures
bullet Transportation Accidents Information
 
  - Auto Accidents Information
   
  - What to do after an Auto Accident
  - Auto Accidents FAQ
  - Truck Accidents Information
  - Metro – WMATA – Information
bullet Traumatic Brain Injury Information
 
  - Types of Traumatic Brain Injury
  - Emergency Treatment for a Traumatic Brian Injury
bullet Spinal Cord Injury Information
 
  - Causes of a Spinal Cord Injury
  - Emergency Treatment for a Spinal Cord Injury
bullet Nursing Home Neglect Information
bullet Asbestos Disease Information
 
  - Asbestos Exposure Information
  - Mesothelioma Treatment Options
bullet Medical Malpractice Information
 
  - Medical Malpractice FAQ
bullet Birth Injury Information
 
  - Cerebral Palsy Information
bullet Products Liability Information
 
  - Products Liability FAQ
bullet Federal Tort Claims Act
bullet Appeals
 
 
2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 450, Washington D.C. 20006
6301 Ivy Lane, Suite 700, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770
10300 Eaton Place, Suite 200, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
shadow
footer